QRZ! Ham Radio 3/QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 3.iso/digests/infoham/940316.txt

Internet Message Format | 1994-06-04 | 24.0 KB

Date: Mon, 21 Mar 94 22:09:15 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #316
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Mon, 21 Mar 94       Volume 94 : Issue  316

Today's Topics:
                    1994 Contest calendar enclosed
                   2 meter use in London, England?
                        2m HT recomendations ?
                   Canadian Reciprocal Info Please
                     ICOM 24AT Information wanted
                Internet<->Packet and Part 97 (2 msgs)
                    IPS Daily Report - 20 March 94
                Looking for Long. and Lat. information
                       QSLing packet messages?
                         subscribe info-hams
                                 test
               What is (and how do I make) a diplexer?
                      Why no 10 meter activity??

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <[e-mail]>
Send subscription requests to: <[e-mail]>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to [e-mail].

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 22:06:55 +0000
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!nic-nac.CSU.net!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!demon!g8sjp.demon.co.uk![e-mail]
Subject: 1994 Contest calendar enclosed
To: [e-mail]

In article <2mkona$[e-mail]>
           [e-mail] "Scott Sminkey - Sustaining Eng Group" writes:

> [e-mail] (Dave Bushong)
> >
> >Here is the 1994 contest calendar from CQ.
> [lots deleted]
> >ARRL June VHF Contest  2/Jun   33
>
> Looks like either CQ misprinted this or someone somewhere made an
> assumption that the ARRL June VHF QSO Party is on its traditional
> second weekend of June date. As it stands now, the ARRL June VHF
> QSO Party is on the FIRST weekend of June in 1994.

While you may think this is a bit of a bummer, it *does* coincide with the
IARU Region 1 50MHz event (run for the first time in 1994).

Last year, the RSGB 50MHz Trophy contest was run on the same weekend as the
ARRL June VHF QSO Party. Although our contest was 8 hours only on the Sunday,
I was set up and ready by 1600z on the Saturday. With nothing better to do
during the evening, I sat back from my (relatively elevated) position in
grid IO82jj listening to the Es QSOs from central / southern Europe rolling
past. For a few minutes, the band opened to W4-land, and there were a few
surprised ops saying things like 'GW0RDI/P what was that grid again???'

This year, the contest will be 24 hours (1400z-1400z) and you can expect all
of the European big guns (this is a relative term - current UK licence
restricts *ERP* on 50MHz to 100W) to be active. You may just pick up a few
extra grids on 6M this way. It's worth looking ...

I have what most Europeans would describe as a 'good' station on 50MHz -
2 x 7el Create long Yagis plus 1 x 8el Create long Yagi, both fed from a
single TX, and feeding separate ICOM 726 xcvrs for receive. If / when the
UK authorities see sense, I have a Henry 6N2 .....

What hours (GMT) does your contest run?

--
Iain Philipps

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 21:55:03 +0000
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!demon!g8sjp.demon.co.uk![e-mail]
Subject: 2 meter use in London, England?
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail]  writes:

>   London is allocated D but there aren't any repeaters in the London
>   area that have CTCSS yet (I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong)

S'right. The first is likely to be the replacement West London machine, which
is likely to be installed about an hour after I remove it from the bench
where it's being soak-tested (since October ...)

I am hard put to recall more than two 2M repeaters ('PI and 'KN) in the Home
Counties area which currently use CTCSS. 70CMs is a different story ...

--
Iain Philipps

------------------------------

Date: 21 Mar 1994 20:39:33 GMT
From: news.cerf.net!pravda.sdsc.edu!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.net.csuchico.edu!charnel!olivea!sgigate.sgi.com!sgiblab!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net![e-mail]
Subject: 2m HT recomendations ?
To: [e-mail]

I am thinking about buying a 2m HT. I have read the glossy ads,
in CQ and 73 but I can not come to any conclusions.

Which do you use ? What are its good / bad points ?

Is power important or is battery life more critical ?

What features are important DTMF, CTCSS, pageing, ...

I am looking at models from Kenwood, Yeasu, and I-COM. I am
leaning toward the Kenwood TH-28A.  I am also looking at the
Yeasu F-11R and 411 as well as a few models from I-COM.

I would appreciated any recomendations or info on these or
other 2m HTs before I take the plunge and buy one.

I do plan on carring it with me once and a while but moslty I
will use it in my car or at home.

Thanks,
     Harland

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harland MacKenzie                              "Once you have eliminated
Department of Mechanical Engineering            the impossible, what ever
University of Brithish Columbia                 remains, no matter how
Vancouver, B.C. Canada                          improbable, must be the
             truth",
Internet: [e-mail]                   Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
CompuServe: 72162,2245
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Date: 22 Mar 1994 00:31:15 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swrinde!sgiblab!sgigate.sgi.com!olivea!news.bu.edu!dartvax.dartmouth.edu![e-mail]
Subject: Canadian Reciprocal Info Please
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]>
[e-mail] (Gilbert Baron) writes:

> >I will be in Edmonton in late June/early July and want to be able to use a
>
> In Canada the reciprocity is automatic. Just bring your radio, eveidence of
> its US origin, US Citizenship, and enjoy operating.

The inquiring party is British, not U.S.
---
=======================================================================
Kenneth E. Harker  N1PVB        Dartmouth College  Amateur Packet Radio
[e-mail]  Hinman Box 1262    [e-mail]
[phone]                  Hanover, NH 03755  or n1pvb-5 on 144.99
=======================================================================
             (PGP Public Key now available on request)

------------------------------

Date: 21 Mar 1994 21:55:07 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.intercon.com!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!rpi!rembrandt.its.rpi.edu![e-mail]
Subject: ICOM 24AT Information wanted
To: [e-mail]

Hi, I have an ICOM 24AT that I want to modify to transmit
out of band.  And I have a text file I ftped off of
I think oakland.oak.edu which says how to do it, but it
mentions diodes by number and not physical location.
If anyone has the ICOM 24AT service manual I would appreciate it
if you would email me. . .
I need to know the physical location of:
D13
D7
D8
D14
If you could scan the page and uuencode it and email it I would
even more appreciative. . .

In any case any info or help is greatly appreciated. . .

    -Jon
     [e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 01:35:37 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!sgiblab!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!newshub.ccs.yorku.ca!apogee.ccs.yorku.ca![e-mail]
Subject: Internet<->Packet and Part 97
To: [e-mail]

Jason Rimmer ([e-mail]) wrote:
:  My intention here is to set up a internet<->packet gateway.  The catch is I
: want it to be automatic.  Once I made that decision I have to deal with
: Part 97's rules about third-party traffic.  That's where the issue greys...
:  What are my troubles?  I know vulgarities are a problem, but anything else?
: If it's just vulgarities, I can just write something to screen those out.
: What other issues need to be dealt with.  Or has that already been done?

I think (and I may be speaking way out of turn here) that the general way
people around here have approached this issue is to ensure that email text
hits the air (i.e. over packet) *ONLY* at the behest of an amateur, so that
then the amateur is the one controlling the transmission (and I guess that
means the one liable for any infraction, whether they could know that it
would happen or not in advance). So, any email transversing the gateway can
only be delivered to a land-based bbs, and must be read from there at the
request of an amateur operator. With fine tuning, I believe they can tell
that if I originated the message over the airwaves, then it can be delivered
over the airwaves to it's destination.

73 de Ed / VE3ZVZ

: ---
: Jason Rimmer
: Eclectic Technologies
: [e-mail]

: Object technology for the masses...

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 02:15:39 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com![e-mail]
Subject: Internet<->Packet and Part 97
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Ed Leslie) writes:
>From: [e-mail] (Ed Leslie)
>Subject: Re: Internet<->Packet and Part 97
>Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 01:35:37 GMT

>Jason Rimmer ([e-mail]) wrote:
>:       My intention here is to set up a internet<->packet gateway.  The catch is I
>: want it to be automatic.  Once I made that decision I have to deal with
>: Part 97's rules about third-party traffic.  That's where the issue greys...
>:       What are my troubles?  I know vulgarities are a problem, but anything else?
>: If it's just vulgarities, I can just write something to screen those out.
>: What other issues need to be dealt with.  Or has that already been done?

>I think (and I may be speaking way out of turn here) that the general way
>people around here have approached this issue is to ensure that email text
>hits the air (i.e. over packet) *ONLY* at the behest of an amateur, so that
>then the amateur is the one controlling the transmission (and I guess that
>means the one liable for any infraction, whether they could know that it
>would happen or not in advance). So, any email transversing the gateway can
>only be delivered to a land-based bbs, and must be read from there at the
>request of an amateur operator. With fine tuning, I believe they can tell
>that if I originated the message over the airwaves, then it can be delivered
>over the airwaves to it's destination.

>73 de Ed / VE3ZVZ

>: ---
>: Jason Rimmer
>: Eclectic Technologies
>: [e-mail]

>: Object technology for the masses...

 That's true, but if I "know" what's not allowed to be transmitted over the
air, then I can figure out a way to filter that out.  i.e. A message comes
from Internet and the destination is over packet.  Once the message is
received, a program jumps in, scans the message for obscenities (and whatever
else needs to be caught), and either replaces the offending text, or deletes
the message entirely.  If the message is not deleted, then it forwards it
over packet, otherwise it sends the message over packet to the addressee of
the message stating that it was not able to be sent, due to obscenities, etc.
 Does that sound plausible?



---
Jason Rimmer
Eclectic Technologies
[e-mail]

Object technology for the masses...

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 20 Mar 1994 23:19:50 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!sserve!usage!metro!ipso![e-mail]
Subject: IPS Daily Report - 20 March 94
To: [e-mail]

SUBJ: IPS DAILY SOLAR AND GEOPHYSICAL REPORT
ISSUED AT 20/2330Z MARCH 1994 BY IPS RADIO AND SPACE SERVICES
FROM THE REGIONAL WARNING CENTRE (RWC), SYDNEY.
SUMMARY FOR 20 MARCH AND FORECAST UP TO 23 MARCH

IPS Warning 09 was issued on 18 MAR and is still current.
-----------------------------------------------------------

1A. SOLAR SUMMARY
Activity: very low

Flares: none.

Observed 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 089/033

1B. SOLAR FORECAST
             21 March           22 March           23 March
Activity     Very low           Very low           Very low
Fadeouts     None expected      None expected      None expected

Forecast 10.7 cm flux/Equivalent Sunspot Number : 090/034

1C. SOLAR COMMENT
None.
-----------------------------------------------------------

2A. MAGNETIC SUMMARY
Geomagnetic field at Learmonth : unsettled to active

Estimated Indices : A   K           Observed A Index 19 March
    Learmonth       17  3234 3334
    Fredericksburg  08                          14
    Planetary       10                          15


2B. MAGNETIC FORECAST
DATE      Ap    CONDITIONS
21 Mar    25    Unsettled to active.
22 Mar    30    Active.
23 Mar    25    Mostly unsettled.

2C. MAGNETIC COMMENT
None.

3A. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION SUMMARY
             LATITUDE BAND
DATE        LOW            MIDDLE         HIGH
20 Mar      normal         normal         normal
PCA Event : None.
3B. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION FORECAST
             LATITUDE BAND
DATE        LOW            MIDDLE         HIGH
21 Mar      normal         normal         normal
22 Mar      normal         normal-fair    normal-fair
23 Mar      normal         normal-fair    normal-fair
3C. GLOBAL HF PROPAGATION COMMENT
NONE.

-----------------------------------------------------------

4A. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC SUMMARY
MUFs at Sydney were near predicted monthly values.

Observed T index for 20 March:  47

Predicted Monthly T Index for March is 40.

4B. AUSTRALIAN REGION IONOSPHERIC FORECAST
DATE   T-index  MUFs
21 Mar    45    Near predicted monthly values.
22 Mar    10    15 to 20% below predicted monthly values.
23 Mar    20    About 15% below predicted monthly values.


4C. AUSTRALIAN REGION COMMENT
None.
--
IPS Regional Warning Centre, Sydney           |IPS Radio and Space Services
email: [e-mail]  fax: [phone]      |PO Box 5606
RWC Duty Forecaster   tel: [phone]      |West Chatswood NSW 2057
Recorded Message      tel: [phone]      |AUSTRALIA

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 19:47:04 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!crash!telesoft![e-mail]
Subject: Looking for Long. and Lat. information
To: [e-mail]

In <[e-mail]> fcs$[e-mail] writes:
>I am looking for an anonymous ftp site from which I can get the
>longitude and latitude of a fair number of places.  It doesn't have
>to be a complete listing.  I am mostly interested in places outside
>of the United States, especially Australia.

Try the geographic name server by using "telnet 141.212.99.9 3000".  Use "?"
to get info.  You can enter a zip code or city name and get something like
this:

Melbourne, Australia
0 Melbourne
3 AS Australia
R Victoria
F 45 Populated place
L 37 50 00 S 145 00 00 E

--GaryM

------------------------------

Date: 21 Mar 1994 02:18:40 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!pacbell.com!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!icon!hpchase.rose.hp.com![e-mail]
Subject: QSLing packet messages?
To: [e-mail]

Hi,

I've recently received several messages via packet asking me to exchange
QSL cards.  How does one respond to these?  Since there was no actual
QSO, I can't see filling out QSO information.  So what (if anything) does
one put on a QSL card in response to a packet message?  I'm also a little
curios why someone would want a card from a station they didn't actually
work.

73,
Chris Moore
N6IYS
[e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: 22 Mar 94 05:38:03 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: subscribe info-hams
To: [e-mail]

subscribe info-hams JPdunn

------------------------------

Date: 21 Mar 1994 14:05:50 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!sgiblab!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!newshost.wcc.govt.nz![e-mail]
Subject: test
To: [e-mail]



NZ HF

 2012  USB, ----, Harbour authority working
 2018  USB, ZKCT, Civil Defence, Central zone
 2021  USB, ZKHQ, Civil Defence, HQ
 2024  USB, ----, Civil Defence, Regional Councils
 2027  USB, ZKNT, Civil Defence, Northern zone
 2030  USB, ZKST, Civil Defence, Southern zone
 2045  USB, ----, Private Coast stations
 2068  USB, ----, Ship-Ship working
 2089  USB, ----, Aquatic sporting events
 2129  USB, ----, Aquatic sporting events
 2162  USB, ----  Private Coast stations, Harbour authorities
 2182  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Distress/Calling
 2207  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Working, WX broadcasts
 2444  USB, ----, Private Coast stations
 2456  USB, ----, Ship-Ship working
 2480  USB, ----, Private Coast stations
 2493.0 CW, ZLO,  NAVCOMSTA Waiouru
 2638  USB, ----, Ship-Ship working
 2863  USB, ----, Auckland Volmet, H+20 and H+50
 3032  USB, ZKX,  Airforce Auckland, 0900-2100 UTC
 3261  USB, ZKIB, South Island mountain radio service, Skeds 0600-0800 UTC
 3312  USB, ----, Land based sporting events
 3345  USB, ZLJG, North Island Mountain Radio, Skeds 0600-0800 UTC
 3354  USB, ZKCT, Civil Defence, Central zone
 3357  USB, ZKNT, Civil Defence, Northern zone
 3360  USB, ZKHQ, Civil Defence, Wellington HQ and Southern zone
 3467  USB, ZKAK, Auckland Radio, SP6
 3935   AM, ZLXA, Print Disabled Radio, Levin, 2030-1000 UTC daily
 4125  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Distress and Calling
 4146  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Working, Wx broadcasts
 4263.0 CW, ZLO,  Irirangi, RNZN
 4417  USB, ----, Ship-Ship working
 4445  USB, ----, Kerikeri marine radio, Skeds 0500-0900 UTC
 4853  USB, ----, Land based sporting events
 5380  USB, ZKST, Civil Defence, Southern zone
 5383  USB, ZKCT, Civil Defence, Central zone
 5386  USB, ZKHQ, Civil Defence, Wellington HQ
 5389  USB, ZKNT, Civil Defence, Northern zone
 5592  USB, ----, Queenstown flight service
 5643  USB, ZKAK, Auckland Radio, SP6 freq family
 5688  USB, ZKX,  Airforce Auckland,
 5726  USB, ZKAK, Auckland Radio, Antarctic summer season
 5807  FAX, ZKLF, Auckland FAX, 24 hrs
 5960   AM, ZLXA, Print Disabled Radio, Levin, QRV late 1994
 6215  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Distress and Calling
 6224  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Working, Wx broadcasts
 6224  USB, ----, Ship-Ship working
 6339.5 CW, ZLO,  NAVCOMSTA Waiouru
 6679  USB, ZKAK, Auckland Volmet, H+20 and H+50
 7290   AM, ZLXA, Print Disabled Radio, Levin, 2030-1800 daily
 8291  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Distress and Calling
 8297  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Working, Wx Broadcasts
 8297  USB, ----, Kerikeri marine radio, Skeds 0400-0600 UTC
 8297  USB, ----, Ship-Ship working
 8601.0 CW, ZLO,  NAVCOMSTA Waiouru
 8828  USB, ZKAK, Auckland Volmet, H+20 and H+50
 8867  USB, ZKAK, Auckland Radio, SP6 freq family
 8976  USB, ZKX,  Airforce Auckland, 2100-0900 UTC
 8997  USB, ZKAK, Auckland Radio, Antarctic summer season
 9459  FAX, ZKLF, Auckland FAX, 24 hrs
11236  USB, ZKX,  Airforce Auckland, 2100-0900 UTC
12290  USB, ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Distress/Calling
12356  USB  ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Working, Wx broadcasts
12719.5 CW  ZLO,  NAVCOMSTA Waiouru
13207  USB  ZKX,  Airforce Auckland, 2100-0900 UTC
13251  USB  ZKAK, Auckland Radio, Antarctic summer season
13261  USB  ZKAK, Auckland Radio, SP6 freq family
13282  USB  ZKAK, Auckland Volmet, H+20 and H+50
13550  FAX  ZKLF, Auckland FAX, 24 hrs
16340  FAX  ZKLF, Auckland FAX, 24 hrs
16420  USB  ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Distress/Calling
16531  USB  ZLM,  Taupo Maritime Radio, Working, Wx broadcasts
17227.5 CW  ZLO,  NAVCOMSTA Waiouru
17904  USB  ZKAK, Auckland Radio, SP6 freq family

------------------------------

Date: 21 Mar 1994 22:48:32 GMT
From: dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!s1.gov!fastrac.llnl.gov!usenet.ee.pdx.edu!news.reed.edu!gaia.ucs.orst.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!sgiblab!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.@@ihnp4.ucsd.edu
Subject: What is (and how do I make) a diplexer?
To: [e-mail]

I looked in to this about a year ago. There is an excellent
article in the October 1991 issue of QST. The sticking point for
me was finding the three ait dielectric trim caps. By the time I
have paid for those at about US$8.00 each (small lot cost) I have
paid for half of one already built and tested. I bought one for
my car and have been happy with it. If you are still interested
in building your own, send me your snail-mail address and I'll
send you a copy of the article.

73

de Bill, KD6MCI
E-Mail [e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: 22 Mar 94 02:52:55 GMT
From: dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!news.ysu.edu!yfn.ysu.edu![e-mail]
Subject: Why no 10 meter activity??
To: [e-mail]

Regarding Solar Activity information, don't forget to check out
the daily reports posted in rec.radio.info. Also notices of solar
flare and geomagnetic storm and auroral activity.

An elmer of mine in the early '60's said to me: "ALWAYS check
ten meters first, no matter how dead the bands seem. You'll be
surprised more often than you'd expect."  He was right.
---
Chuck Reti  Detroit ,MI   WV8A
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
wv8a@wb8zpn.#semi.mi.usa.na

------------------------------

Date: 21 Mar 1994 23:15:13 GMT
From: news.cerf.net!pravda.sdsc.edu!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.net.csuchico.edu!charnel!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!eff!news.umbc.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.@@ihnp4.ucsd.edu
To: [e-mail]

References <2m58sq$[e-mail]>, <2mfkd6$[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>on.a
Subject : Re: FT-990 vs TS-850

NADO000 ([e-mail]) wrote:

Referring to the choice between a Yaesu FT990 and a Kenwood TS850:


: A friend has both the Yeasu 757 and a Kenwood 440AT and he confirms
: the same findings. The Yeasu is more pleasant to listen to and most
: of us do a lot more listening than talking. My next rig is likely to
: be a Yeasu.

This seems to be a popular pair of radios.  There've been several
postings over the last months asking for comparisons between these rigs.
I've also narrowed my choices down to these two if (when?) I ever
replace my Drake rigs.  One thing that almost never seems to get
mentioned however...

How do these rigs sound on the air!  At the risk of starting a flame
war, I'll venture the opinion that, in general, I find Kenwoods putting
out among the best sounding signals on the air.  I've got to admit that
I enjoy hearing the reports of superior audio quality that my Drakes
seem to get on sideband, and I'd hate to give that up.  I like putting
out a good pleasing signal!  If it weren't for that factor, I'd probably
lean towards the Yaesu.  As it is, I'm not sure.

Any thoughts or comments on the transmitting audio qualities of the
major brands on sideband, particularly these two radios?


Scott Turner  N0VRF  [e-mail]

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #316
******************************
******************************